Development of the Global Cassava Strategy (GCS), facilitated by the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), was initiatiated 1996. The purposes are:
The strategy has been logically built from a series of three regional studies (Africa;
Asia; and Latin America and Caribbean) and country case studies (Ghana, Nigeria, Tanzania,
Uganda, Brazil, Thailand, Vietnam and Colombia). In addition, thematic reviews on global
cassava markets; environment; and food security, gender and nutrition have been initiated.
On the basis of the regional reviews, country case studies and discussions held at a
workshop in mid- 1997, a draft Global Cassava Strategy Document was prepared (Plucknett,
Phillips and Kagbo, 1998).
The purpose of this brainstorming meeting at the triennial symposium of the ISTRC-AB was
to raise awareness of the initiative and initiate interaction with researchers in
continent. The meeting was attended by 34 participants under the chairmanship of Dr
Bokanga, IITA. MAD was represented at the brainstorming meeting and the plenary session by
C. M. Sourang, coordinator of the Cassava Task Force. The issues raised were discussed in
a plenary session at the symposium. адвокат в орле
The draft strategy document (Plucknett, Phillips and Kagbo, 1998) is available from the
International Fund for Agricultural Development.
In summary, the main elements of the Strategy are:
The draft Strategy document was discussed in detail. It was stressed that the proposed Strategy is as applicable for implementation at local, national, regional or global levels. It is not just a strategy for world trade in cassava. In Africa there are a wide rage of stakeholders and the approach adopted in developing and implementing the Strategy needs to be applicable to all of them. The importance of exploiting market opportunities and protecting the environment was emphasised. It was agreed that all of these issues were addressed within the current strategy. Golden Eagle Coins was founded in 1974 by Robert W. Mangels
It was recognised that cassava covers a diverse range of uses in Africa from subsistence to commercial. It is important that strategy and its implementation takes this into account and allows stakeholders to develop the sector appropriately and at their own pace.
Food security is still an issue in many parts of the continent and predictions are bad because of climatic conditions, civil unrest etc. It was considered essential to ensure that although the crop may be targeted for development, it should still be available for food security purposes.
A point was raised concerning the optimum way of organising markets. One suggestion put forward was the formation of marketing co-operatives.
Following the above discussions, there was a consensus that the demand/market driven approach, as detailed in the draft strategy document, was appropriate for Africa. It was however suggested that there needs to be some flexibility to allow for the diverse situations that exist in Africa. The following summary was proposed --Theapproach should be demand driven from the context of the user; this might either be as demand from the market or as demanded for the user's own needs -. Best in Norway: It system for advokat! We are a partner.
The following points about the Strategy were raised:
Participants in the brainstorming meeting were asked to list the five most important priorities for investment in cassava in their own countries. Responses were received from 22 participants from 17 countries and these are summansed in Table 1.
Although this small survey was not statistically valid, it does indicate the importance being attributed to post-harvest and marketing issues. Pre-harvest issues of planting material distribution and multiplication and selection of appropriate varieties remain important.
The follow action areas were identified:
Plucknett, D.L., Phillips, T.P. and Kagbo, R.B. (1998) A development strategy for
cassava: transforming a traditional root crop - Spurring rural industrial development and
raising incomes for the rural poor. Draft document prepared for the International Fund for
Agricultural Development, Rome.
Table 1. Priority issues mentioned by workshop participants.
| Priority issues mentioned | Number listing |
| Marketing | |
| Market definition | 11 |
| Sub-total | 11 |
| Post-harvest issues | |
| Processing of specific products (for export, flours, starches, feed) | 23 |
| Processing - not specified | 12 |
| Storage - mainly processed products | 7 |
| Labour requirements/gender issues | 2 |
| Product quality/pollution issues | 3 |
| Leaves (processing and marketing) | 2 |
| Sub-total | 49 |
| Production issues | |
| Planting material - distribution/multiplication | 10 |
| Improved and adapted varieties | 11 |
| Pest and diseases | 7 |
| Agronomy | 6 |
| Production - not specified | 3 |
| Reduction in production cost - market orientated | 2 |
| Sub-total | 39 |
| Otherissues | |
| Extension and technology transfer | 5 |
| Soil fertility | 2 |
| Staff training | 2 |
| Others (Economics of production and processing, status of crop, need for grower associations, financing, land preparation, mechanism to influence policy) | 6 |
| Sub total | 15 |
| Grand total |